Jus Post Bellum Proportionality and the Fog of War
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
a comparative move analysis of the introduction sections of ma theses by iranian and native post-graduate students
since esp received universal attention to smooth the path for academic studies and productions, a great deal of research and studies have been directed towards this area. swales’ (1990) model of ra introduction move analysis has served a pioneering role of guiding many relevant studies and has proven to be productive in terms of helpful guidelines that are the outcome of voluminous productions ...
15 صفحه اولIntroducing Jus ante Bellum as a cosmopolitan approach to humanitarian intervention
Cosmopolitans often argue that the international community has a humanitarian responsibility to intervene militarily in order to protect vulnerable individuals from violent threats and to pursue the establishment of a condition of cosmopolitan justice based on the notion of a ‘global rule of law’. The purpose of this article is to argue that many of these cosmopolitan claims are incomplete and ...
متن کاملThe Moral Equality of Combatants
According to the Just War tradition a war can only be just if two sets of principles are satisfied. First there is the jus ad bellum. These principles tell us when it is just to start a war. There has to be a good reason or a just cause in order for a war to be morally permissible (self-defense, defense of others, putting a stop to human rights violations). The decision to go to war has to be t...
متن کاملThe Ethics of Killing in War * Jeff McMahan
The traditional theory of the just war comprises two sets of principles, one governing the resort to war ( jus ad bellum) and the other governing the conduct of war ( jus in bello). The two sets of principles are regarded, in Michael Walzer’s words, as “logically independent. It is perfectly possible for a just war to be fought unjustly and for an unjust war to be fought in strict accordance wi...
متن کاملعدالت پس از جنگ و مسئولیت حمایت از قربانیان مخاصمات مسلحانه
دکترین مسئولیت حمایت، که در سال‌های اخیر در گفتمان سازمان ملل متحد و به‌ویژه دبیرکل ملل متحد به‌کرّات بدان اشاره شده، بیش از هر موضوعی به حوضة حقوق توسل به زور یا jus ad bellum ربط دارد؛ که بر مسئولیت و تعهد جهانی برای حمایت از غیر نظامیان با توسل به نیروی نظامی استوار است. توسل به زور در این شرایط باید با رعایت کامل منشور ملل متحد و حقوق بین‌الملل بشردوستانه یا jus in bello همراه و هدف اصلی آن ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of International Law
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0938-5428,1464-3596
DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chs084